Nikki Haley and Southern Poverty Law Center On The Same Team

It appears the far left-wing organization, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), desires to represent Lutheran Services in the recent lawsuit brought against Governor Nikki Haley and the State Refugee Resettlement Agencies by a private citizen, Brian Bilbro.

The plaintiff is suing Haley, The South Carolina Department of Social Services (SCDSS), Lutheran Services and World Relief of Spartanburg over the settlement of refugees in his state, and seeks to stop the State 2016 Refugee Resettlement Plan, due to imminent risks to he and his family, personally and economically.

The SPLC  claims to be an organization that monitors hate groups, and seeks justice for the most vulnerable members of society, yet it demonizes anyone who dares bring to light issues like the Islamic movement in our country. They tout defending against discrimination and intolerance, but can’t tolerate the truth expressed by anyone who isn’t a liberal or a leftist. And what is more interesting is the fact they would want to represent an agency affiliated with a church.

The charitable organizations involved in Refugee Resettlement are  Volunteer Agencies, otherwise known as VOLAGS, who claim multi million dollar revenues. Most of the VOLAGS are religiously affiliated, one of them being Lutheran Services. But, the church related charity, Lutheran Services, who the SPLC would be representing, doesn’t have anything to do with Christianity or teaching about the love of Jesus when it comes to resettlement.

Lutheran Immigration Services is all about settling refugees into communities all over the country for federal money. In fact, Lutheran services is paid by the head, and for every refugee planted into a community it means dollars to them. Since federal monies are involved they are prohibited from sharing the gospel with the refugees.

Lauren Martel, Bilbro’s attorney, asked  Anne Richards, Assistant Secretary of State for Population, Refugees and Migration, about the Federal grant money that the VOLAGS receive, and if it would have an affect on their ability to proselytize. Her answer, “It’s true, it’s true. We expect our partners will not proselytize and also that they will accept LGBT refugees and treat them with the same respect.”

The vision of the Lutheran Immigration Services is:

“All migrants and refugees are protected, embraced and empowered in a world of just and welcoming communities.”

It seems like there are many in South Carolina that aren’t that open to accepting refugees that cannot be vetted, nor should they be. Common sense would have the truly needy refugees taken care of within their own culture which wouldn’t threaten the security of South Carolinians or require continually more taxes in order to service the refugees who overwhelmingly require welfare in order to survive.

The sticking points of the Plaintiff are simple. Our top national security leaders have stated the refugees cannot be vetted properly, especially the ones coming from countries who sponsor terrorism. A matter of fact that even Governor Haley once agreed with, but now seems to have changed her tune. She stated in a letter to Secretary of State Kerry in November,

“…there remain gaps in available intelligence for those fleeing Syria. This lack of historical and verifiable intelligence with many Syrian refuges makes it difficult, if not impossible, to thoroughly vet individuals seeking to enter the United States as a refugee. Therefore, until I can be assured that all potential refugees from Syria have no ties to terrorist organizations, I am requesting that the State Department not resettle any Syrian refugees in South Carolina.”

She then continued that she would take measures to ensure the safety of South Carolinians if that were to be the case. One wonders what Haley has done to keep that promise because in December of 2015, several Syrian refugees were settled in Midlands, South Carolina by Lutheran services.

This brings up the question of accountability and tracking. Who is responsible for these refugees after the VOLAG is out of the picture? If just one out of one hundred refugees commits an act of terrorism on our soil, who is to receive the blame? Remember it only took 19 terrorist to inflict more casualties than Pearl Harbor.

No matter what our Governors’ or Congressmens’ intentions are, they can’t seem to stop this freight train of Refugee Resettlement. Until they are held personally accountable for simply writing letters and then rolling over in submission when that doesn’t work, nothing will change.

The American citizen deserves to be protected from enemies both foreign and domestic. We have members of ISIS within our country. There are also  members of the terrorist organization claiming to infiltrate the refugee ranks and promising attacks within our country within the year. The duty of protecting the citizens of this country from foreign threats lies with those elected officials charged with upholding the Constitution.

Brian Bilbro gets it, and so does his legal counsel, Lauren Martel. It is plain to the well-informed American what is happening here. It is clear who the courageous ones are in this scenario, and it isn’t Governor Haley or The Southern Poverty Law Center. They both are failing to stand up for the people who are being pushed around by this over-reaching Federal Government who intends to place its citizens in harms way by threatening their personal security as well as their economic security through an ill-considered Refugee Program.









6 responses to “Nikki Haley and Southern Poverty Law Center On The Same Team

  1. Ryan McAvoy

    Glad someone is stepping up to the plate.

  2. Bill Coleman

    “A Vision For Stopping The Advance Of Islam” (rev. 2/16/16) by Bill Coleman.

    (A) There are two over riding issues in this election season …….
    both of which are politically incorrect to discuss and which would have never been talked about if not for Trump. Who you support depends on whether or not you recognize these as being more important than any other campaign issues. I will present these issues as questions.

    (1) Is there much chance of a conservative president of any “stripe” being elected in the future if the illegals have a pathway to voting and which candidate can be expected to constitutionally keep the most illegals from having a pathway to voting? Falling in the same category is this question: Which candidate is actually expected to close and control the borders of the U.S.?

    (2) What will happen to our hard earned culture of freedom if the advance of Islam is not constitutionally stopped in the U.S.?

    Like the truth or not, these are the two over riding questions in this political season. Any of the other candidates in the past 10 years could have had a better solution to these questions than Trump and been elected president in the current and previous election cycles. The extent to which they did not is proportional to the extent they did not connect to the “silent majority” who are common sense conservatives and constitutional nationalists. Bill Coleman.

    (B) The Advancement of Islam ……. 
    If the whole world was muslim, Islam would still be purifying Islam with the more devout Muslims following the doctrine of Islam by killing the less devout muslims. Islam has remained the same bloody death cult for 1400 years because the doctrine of Islam prevents it’s reformation. Our central and state governments refuse to protect the USA from the advancement of Islam or promote the teaching of the unbiased history of the political component of the supremist tyrannical unreformable religion of Islam.

    Any inclusion of Islam anywhere in the USA by government or action anywhere in the world by the Federal Government (A) other than for the purpose of “education which promotes knowledge of the total truth of the political component of the unreformable religion of Islam” and/or (B) which advances Islam should be “nipped in the bud” (with few, if any, justified exceptions). The evil of Islam is in the tyrannical and supremist political component of the unreformable doctrine of Islam. Islam is like no other religion in the world because it is a religion that was designed by a savage to be attractive to savages. The successful advance of Islam (also known as “outer jihad” or usually just as “jihad”, whether violent or nonviolent and regardless of what person or entity is doing it) is an ACT OF WAR and is deadly to our entire culture of constitutional freedom, the lives of this and future generations and is an ACT OF WAR because the end result of the successful advance of jihad is the same bloody end result achieved by Islam if the USA had lost an all out war with armed Islamic forces.

    To advance Islam or our surrender to Islam , all that is required is that nothing be constitutionally done to stop the advance of Islam. One of the most effective ways that Islam in the USA is advanced is the movement of muslims, jihadists and unvetted people from muslim or sharia law cultures into the USA. Elected politicians and people who allow or promote the inclusion of a muslim or muslims into our non-muslim or non-sharia law culture or who do not use their constitutional authority to protect their citizens from Islamic terror or are otherwise advancing Islam are promoting an ACT OF WAR against their fellow citizens. Inclusion of Islamic culture into our culture of freedom advances Islam in the USA and the end result is deadly to all that freedom loving Americans hold dear. One of the last stages of successful jihad is when the political component of Islam (known as Sharia Law in its codified version) is adopted by a government as their constitution.

    (C) Stopping The Advance of Islam is Just a State of Mind Until Constitutional Action is Taken ……….
    As far as pushing back on the advance of Islam is concerned, that push back exists only as demands for constitutional rights by nonmuslims and a matter of opinion among a relative few people. While there is considerable effort put into making more people aware of the various aspects of the threat of Islam, actual push back on the advance of Islam in the USA is from a big picture perspective ….. not existing …. except in the minds of a few. While a significant number become politically active when they see living evidence of jihad (i.e., outer jihad, the advancement of Islam, which exists in violent or nonviolent forms) coming at them, most do not understand Islam, do not want to understand Islam or pretend not to understand Islam. The counter jihad movement in the USA exists mainly as a mental awareness of the threat of Islam to all that we hold dear. As long as this mental awareness exists mostly among people who are politically disorganized, these people will have no effect on stopping the advance of Islam in the USA. This mental awareness will only mobilize into organized resistance when these people’s attention is caused to be focused as it has been with (1) the threat from Refugee Resettlement and (2) other smaller isolated encounters such as the advancement of Islam in general education.

    (D) Political Leadership to Stop the Advance of Islam……….
    I firmly believe that, for the forseeable future, the greatest and maybe the only hope for stopping the advancement of Islam in the USA lies with the success of the Donald Trump Presidential campaign. Any candidate could possibly be first in the polls, if they appeared to have the most credible solution towards stopping the advance of Islam in the USA ….. the fact that none other than Trump, connect with people on this issue or either they will drop out in lieu of effectively tackling the Jihad issue and likely rise to the top of the polls, is indicative of the largely covert resistance to stopping the advance of Islam among the elected politicians and the cowardly and self centered nature of many (most?) politicians, candidates and public figures.

    (E) A Possible Legal Step Towards Stopping The Advance of Islam……. 
    The people who own the U.S. Constitution, i.e. the people whose vote is required to amend it (does not include the Executive or Judicial branches of the Federal Government) should amend the COTUS to say that Islam shall not be considered to be a religion in or by the COTUS because of the supremist tyrannical political component of the unreformable Doctrine of Islam. Can Congress do this, without an amendment, without a court ever over ruling it …. I think not likely.

    (F) A 1400 Year History of Unreformable Islam……….
    Sharia law cultures react appropriately to non-muslims in their cultures because they understand that liberty and Islam are close to being 100% incompatible and can not peacefully coexist when either exists in the culture of the other. This is seen in the 1400 year history of Islamic aggression on Earth and is the direct result of the unreformable doctrine of Islam. On the other hand, the non-muslim cultures that have been erased by Islam usually extended their freedom to followers of the supremist and tyrannical political religion called Islam and thereby allowed the advancement of Islam (i.e., acts of war) that eradicated their non-Islamic cultures.

    (G) Do you love our culture of freedom enough to lead, organize and constitutionally identify, fight and win the political and legal battles that will stop the advance of Islam in the USA while we still have the freedom to do so? All comments are appreciated. Bill Coleman.

  3. Great article Suzanne!
    I was shocked when I learned the SPLC was partnering with a “Christian” organization. SPLC is the attack dog of the liberal media. It doesn’t even do its home work before declaring a group a hate group. They just make blanket statements. Why anyone has any respect for this group is beyond my understanding.

  4. Robert Hand

    No truly Christian organization would partner with SPLC!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *